The Isle of Wight Council has been branded ‘stupid’ for accepting the Ministry of Justice’s £6.3 million offer to take over the prison estates.
In a deal accepted last month, but figures only revealed recently, the Isle of Wight Council will take over the upkeep of the infrastructure of the Albany, Parkhurst, and Camp Hill prison estates.
For the one-off payment, however, the council will be undertaking work to fix roads, pavements and street lighting, among other issues, that have been ‘neglected’, residents say, by the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) since the 1970s.
Former Medina Borough councillor for Parkhurst for over 20 years, Jeff Manners said the MOJ was using this ‘an opportunity to offload a huge liability’ and that the Isle of Wight Council would be ‘absolutely stupid to fall for this trick’.
He said:
“Local authorities insist they will not adopt roads until everything is brought up to a certain standard but the MOJ will not do that.
“To bring those estates up to a reasonable standard is going to cost tens of millions of pounds to do the job properly.”
In council documents, adopting the roads into the council’s Highways PFI contract was seen as a point of contention with the roads ‘non-standard construction’ meaning it was not considered feasible to bring the roads up to the adoptable standard under the highways contract.
This means, going forward, apart from the £6.3 million one-off sum to complete initial work on the estates from the MOJ, the financial burden will fall to the council to maintain the roads and the estates. It was noted there was already ‘little allowance’ in the money offered by the MOJ beyond the repairs and ongoing maintenance.
Mr Manners said:
“If the Isle of Wight Council were to be stupid enough to take over this liability they would saddle taxpayers with a huge debt for many years to come.
“If the MOJ were really that sincere why did they not come up with a plan years ago?”
After many years battling the government to get them to care for the estates, the most that was offered to the council by then Minister of State of Prisons, Ann Widdecombe, according to Mr Manners, was a judicial review.
A spokesperson for the Isle of Wight Council said appropriate due diligence was undertaken before making the decision and it was done so so with ‘full expectation that the council’s budget would not be negatively impacted going forward.’
The idea to turn down the MOJ offer was considered but documents show the authority was worried about the impact this may have on its wishes to acquire the old Camp Hill prison, and the spokesperson said the council is now better placed to oversee the repairs and maintenance.
Another issue raised was the disparity of land ownership in contracts when people bought their properties from the government — some contracts even including the roads and pavements outside of their property.
There have been calls for the confidential maps listing which roads the MOJ is transferring to ownership of the council to be released. The council spokesperson said they cannot be published at this point as they will be the subject of discussions with affected residents once the overall programme of works is confirmed.































































































Do we need to be told that the council are stupid, we know that already….
I agree fully with you.
All part of the bigger scheme with the huge estate(s) going to be built up there, why the change St. Mary’s.
Despite all the hype with the Island Roads contract it’s obvious the Council can’t properly look after the roads they are responsible for. Some roads, and I’ll mention just one, Fairlee Road’, are in a shocking state, literally.
I’d miss the sudden dip in the road as you approach Newport – it’s like being on a really bad rollercoaster
This IOW council probably have an alterior motive planned. As for wasting money, well they are ace at that. Look at all our council tax payments wasted on continuous repairs to the FLOATING NOT WORKING MUCH BRIDGE…..
Or, as Cllr Ian Ward (I’m an engineer, you know) would say, 99% efficient.
No doubt all this work will cost the council far more than £6.3 million.