Cowes Town Council has written to the Isle of Wight Council raising a ‘failure of proper process and due diligence’ regarding a drone trial.
In a letter to the Isle of Wight Council’s chief executive officer, Wendy Perera, the Town Council’s clerk, Debbie Faulkner, highlighted 16 grievances relating to the Council’s decision to trial drones at Mornington Road car park.
A press release published by the drone operator implementing the trial, Inteliports, and the Isle of Wight Council, said the testing intends to show how drones can help the Island receive goods and decarbonise its logistics.
Faulkner pointed to the council’s principle from its list of good decision-making rules – due consultation is taken and alternative options are considered prior to decisions being made.
She added the council’s Regeneration Board had declared on 19th July that the trial would begin on 7th August, before any consultation with Cowes Town Council or the area’s residents.
Her letter also claimed that the initial decision to trial drones at the car park was seemingly arrived at without reference to any supporting papers.
With the exception of a letter to the area’s residents on 17th July and a press release sent out by Inteliports on 19th July, Faulkner wrote no written documents justifying the decision have been put together or publicised.
Cowes Town Council have understood there were no open meetings held prior to the public disclosure of the trial, suggesting a total lack of transparency around how the decision to begin the trial was green-lighted.
The letter asked for documentation used to assess the decision as well as meeting minutes – a request it said was justified by the council’s principle (i): a presumption in favour of transparency and openness.
Faulkner concluded:
“The regeneration team appear to have misjudged the complexities surrounding drone flights. Proper due diligence would or should have led them to inquire more carefully about the regulation of drones and to involve early on, the council’s legal department and its health and safety team and invited the former to take specialist independent legal advice.
“The conclusion from our above observations is that there has been a conspicuous lack of concern for proper process and for careful due diligence.
“It is hard to see any area in which the council has followed its own principles of good decision-making.
“In the light of the above failures, CTC invites the IW Council to immediately instigate a formal review of the process taken to arrive at the decision to trial the drones at MRCP and to immediately reverse their decision to lease MRCP to Inteliports for them use it as a drone landing site, whether on a trial basis or for the longer term.”
The Isle of Wight Council has been approached for comment.
Probably because they knew the NIMBY council would stick their oar in.
How could this be a bad thing to trial? I’m sure some prunes will come up with something.