Planning permission is once again being sought to retain a ‘temporary’ footbridge at Brading Train Station, which was installed over 3 years ago. As previously reported by Island Echo, a scheme to repair a 160-year-old Grade II listed footbridge at the station got underway in March 2021 with a temporary alternative footbridge erected. The Isle of Wight Council approved the temporary structure on the condition it would be removed within 12 months of its erection, with plans for the temporary bridge to only actually be needed for 6 months. However, by April 2022 the footbridge still wasn’t ready for use after problems with its footings caused lengthy delays. Then, in December of that year, Network Rail put forward an application to keep the temporary structure for even longer – a further 12 months until December 2023. They gave written assurances that they believed work would be completed within the 12-month period. But the saga rolls on with permission now being sought, once again, to retain the temporary footbridge until 31st October 2024. Back in February, the local authority granted permission for changes to the plans for the historic footbridge as those put forward in March 2021 did not provide enough strength, with additional cross bracing and reinforcement of concrete pad foundations needed.
Despite having had the green light for the revised plans for 3 months already, work is not expected to be completed until the end of October due to the ‘limited availability of line blockades’. This is said to be a ‘worst case scenario’. Delays have been partially blamed on the transition to a new ‘Control Period’ – the 5-year timespans into which Network Rail works for financial and other planning purposes – which has impacted the delivery. By the time the temporary structure is removed in October – assuming it is actually removed by 1st November – it will have been in place for 3-and-a-half years.
NOT SO TEMPORARY! BRADING STATION FOOTBRIDGE TO REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL NOVEMBER
TOP STORIES THIS WEEK
-
MURDER ARRESTS AS MAN IN 50s STABBED TO DEATH IN SANDOWN
-
STABBING LEAVES MAN FIGHTING FOR LIFE – POLICE CORDON OFF SANDOWN HOME
-
GROYNE POLE CLIMB ENDS IN POTENTIALLY LIFE-CHANGING FALL AT BEMBRIDGE
-
MAN AND WOMAN CHARGED OVER ALLEGED SEX ACT IN ISLE OF WIGHT GRAVEYARD
-
FORENSIC INVESTIGATORS CONTINUE FINGERTIP SEARCH OF FATAL STABBING SCENE
.
Sign up to our daily newsletter
Sign up to the daily newsletter and to get our top Isle of Wight news stories sent to you inbox every day.

© 2024 Island Echo Ltd. (10015091) is a company registered in England and Wales. Registered address: Fortis House, Cothey Way, Ryde, Isle of Wight PO33 1QT. VAT: 358464857 (V5)























































































News must be slow for island echo to report this. If they done some factual journalism they would know that any work done on the footbridge would require a full line closure as the workers can’t work over 2 x 750 volts of electric lines under health and safety. But let’s not allow true facts from the echo posting such a non news event
You should note the article does mention “due to the ‘limited availability of line blockades”.
There have been plenty of opportunities over the past 3 years for the line to be closed to enable the works to be carried out, particularly given the more recent strike action.
There is public interest in this story and it is a story we are continuing to pursue. It cannot be described in any shape as a ‘non news event’.
Strike action is generally 1 day and the union only has to give 2 weeks notice . 2 weeks is not enough notice to arrange network rail and other contractors to attend a site, it takes plenty of planning. As the editor, you seem very anti rail just like ivy searle whom you continue to allow to comment such ridiculous comments. In todays world, its no wonder that staff go sick when comments are allowed that are of a derogatory nature towards staff when the clear facts are not displayed. Perhaps next time there is a strike, you could contact the relevant union to hear their side of it
It’s not just that “person” to make the comments, it’s a cesspit and still they’re allowed to be anonymous
Well said.
You are anti railway. You’re reports are relentless and constantly inaccurate. Designed to pull apart what railway we have left.
Just to note, the bridge is not listed. The only listed part are the 4 cast iron legs, the rest is 1980s.
Try being more supportive in your reporting. You flood it with your own personal opinions.
There is no action on the island, run by Numpties
Be quicker to build a new bridge and send the old one to Havenstreet, sure they would love to have it.
Do they actually need two platforms with the new timetable. Thought the idea was to run every half hour hence the passing loop being reinstated.