Planning permission to build houses on the outskirts of Newport has been refused after more than 50 objections were received.
An application for 14 homes on the commuter cut-through Landscape Lane, which connects Staplers Road and Long Lane, was received by the Isle of Wight Council but has been rejected — as it would be a ‘cramped’ and ‘visually intrusive’ development.
The outline plans, submitted last year by Mrs C Ferns, of the Cotton Trust, were said to provide a significant positive opportunity and see 2, 3 and 4-bed houses built as a mix of 1 and 2-storey properties, in 2 cul-de-sacs but the rural feel to the lane would be kept.
The site had been allocated for housing in the draft Island Planning Strategy in 2018, but only for 10 houses.
Current residents of Landscape Lane, as well as other concerned parties including the Newport and Carisbrooke Community Council, CPRE IW and Isle of Wight MP Bob Seely, objected to the development.
Reasons for objecting included the development being built on agricultural, greenfield land, not meeting the local housing need and that it would be an overdevelopment of the site leading to more traffic congestion.
The planning officer’s report said the proposed cul-de-sacs would cause a ‘more compact and cramped arrangement’ of the dwellings — with the 2 bungalows appearing ‘particularly awkward’ — ‘at odds’ with the existing residential ribbon development surrounding the area.
The refusal letter from the council’s strategic planning and infrastructure manager, Oliver Boulter, said the development would have a ‘serious adverse impact’ on the character and appearance of the area, would provide ‘inadequate visibility’ at the junction with Staplers Road and would negatively impact the highway network.
It was also said insufficient information was provided in the planning application to assess the potential impact the building would have on the historic environment of the site as well as a lack of demonstrating how safe and adequate pedestrian links would be provided.
Applicants can appeal the council’s decision and go to the Planning Inspectorate.
Councillor Matt Price, the local councillor for the area and Vice Chairman of the Planning Committee, said:
“I am absolutely delighted that this application has been refused! Local residents were totally against this unnecessary development and saw this as another attempt of further urban sprawl on the outskirts of our county town. This site is currently farmed by a tenant farmer who’s family have been farming this land for generations and this parcel of land is fairly unique as it can be farmed virtually all year round.
“The refusal has been given for multiple reasons and reinforces the fact that site should not be used for anything other than and should be preserved for farming. I had already requested that if this application was to be recommended for approval then the application should be called in for consideration and determination by the IOW Council Planning Committee.
“The development was neither wanted or needed and would do nothing to provide the type of housing we require locally and in fact would have harmed the rural feel of this part of Newport. I am grateful for all the support local people have given to objecting to this application and also for the approach taken by Island Roads, the IOW Councils Planning Officers and the other consultee’s to listen to the objections, enable site visits with me under the difficult restrictions and to carefully consider all aspects of this application. I would also like to thank Newport and Carisbrooke Community Council for their considerations and objections.
“There is absolutely no need currently for ANY greenfield development within Newport as there are more than enough brownfield and previously developed sites ready and waiting for redevelopment. I will continue to fight inappropriate applications on Greenfield sites within the ward I represent.”
Perhaps only huge building programmes that can afford to ‘grease enough of the right palms’ go ahead, despite being far, far more destructive to nature, road congestion, add greatly to hospital, doctors, dentist, and all other infrastructure here.
Smaller ‘development’ can’t create enough wealth to issue enough brown envelopes, so, our ‘caring’ council can quash such to give the ‘appearance’ that all is above board, when, most see it as it ‘really is’.
We need to remove these people when given the chance.
Excellent.i live near there.greed greed greed .all is
Small developments can’t afford the necessary ‘thank you’ cards to those in the ‘right places’, is the only reason such can be turned down, hence all the huge, mega damaging building projects ‘gain’ permission.
SEE IT HOW IT IS, then use the ballot box wisely.
Stand by to fight the appeal.
Bring it on