The Island’s MP has won an important victory in the battle to stop unwanted greenfield housing development on the Island.
Bob Seely – who has led a group of MPs campaigning nationally to reverse unrealistic and damaging housing targets – has been told by the Secretary of State for Housing, Robert Jenrick, that the proposed controversial algorithm that dictated the scale and location of housebuilding has now been scrapped.
Under the proposals, over 1,000 new homes would have been built on the Island each year. Mr Seely has argued this level of housing would damage the local environment and would not address the local housing needs.
Welcoming the news, Mr Seely said he would continue to lobby Government to ensure that new housing was built in the right areas and in line with local need. Mr Seely said the Island needs affordable homes built on brownfield sites. He said:
“This is good news. I’m grateful to Ministers for listening to members of the public, Councillors and MPs. I am sure MPs will want to look at the re-jigged plans in detail, but this is an initial victory for those who care about their communities.
“Most of all, I want to thank Parish and Town councillors and individual Islanders who wrote to the Secretary of State or took part in the consultation process. The Government listened to our concerns and has acted on them.”
Seely said he would also be liaising with the Isle of Wight Council to seek new designations that strike a balance between regeneration and preserving the Island’s environment. But he warned that while the controversial 10,000 home target had been dropped, more action was needed to ensure new houses were built in a sustainable way.
Bob said:
“While this is a very welcome announcement, the target to which we now revert is still too high. We need to stop speculative, greenfield sprawl building on the Island. We need to build well-designed, high-quality housing, on brownfield sites in existing communities, in appropriate numbers, for Islanders.
“Whilst this is an important initial victory, I will be working with others to make changes to any new proposed laws to give the Island more flexibility and to allow us to overwhelmingly focus on urban regeneration.
“I always say that I can’t promise to win every battle but I will fight every battle on behalf of the Island. This is a good result, but there is more to be done next year.
“We must also look at new protection for our countryside and landscape, whether by extending the AONB or by creating a new Island Park designation. I will be talking to the Council about this in the coming months to see if we can agree a joint position. I hope we can.”
Article continues below this advertisement
Well done!
10,000 target has been dropped but, action was needed to ensure new houses were built in a sustainable way.
So on the one hand less may not mean less, but it makes him look good as i am sure the big developments if turned down will go to the government and get things overturned.
Praise where it is due, well done Bob, don’t rest on laurels, and keep pushing and deeply questioning housing requirements AND deeply question this policy of our council being paid to take in over spill from other councils.
Never let your guard down and if you make over building on the Island a priority you will gain a lot of support, provided it is more than lip service.
Well done keep going Bob!
The 10,000 target was never houses, it was for homes. A block of flats has a lot of homes it it.
Seeley is congratulating himself for something that was always going to change because Boris wants to secure northern votes and development up there looks like investment.
Build flats on brownfield derelict hotel sites and the target is pretty much done.